In a recent political development, Hon. Kahinda Otafiire has openly opposed a proposal by some Members of Parliament that suggested electing the President through political parties, rather than by popular vote.
The proposal sparked significant debate, particularly among opposition members, who expressed concerns over its implications.
Otafiire firmly rejected the idea, arguing that the framers of Uganda’s constitution were deliberate in mandating that the President be elected by more than 51% of the population.
He emphasized that this threshold was designed to ensure a broad-based mandate, which aligns with democratic principles.
Otafiire did not mince words, asserting that the proposal disregarded the wisdom embedded in the country’s constitutional framework and vowed to defend the current system until his last days.
The issue has drawn attention from various political actors, as Otafiire’s stance signals a strong defense of Uganda’s electoral integrity, insisting that leadership legitimacy should stem from a majority vote by the citizens.
His statements reflect his broader position on maintaining constitutional adherence and upholding democratic standards within the country’s political system.
This pushback against the proposal underscores the complexities of Uganda’s political landscape, where constitutional provisions are fiercely debated by leaders across the spectrum.
