Makerere University lecturers have unanimously rejected the proposed introduction of a biometric staff attendance management system.
The Biometric Attendance Management system is criticized by academic staff for its narrow focus on monitoring physical presence between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
However, they argue that assessing academic staff performance should consider a broader range of outputs including teaching, research, publications, community service, assessments, and networking for research and grants.
The resolution to reject the new system was passed during an Emergency General Assembly held on October 20, 2023, by the lecturers under their umbrella organization, Makerere University Academic Staff Association (Muasa).
Makerere University had recently decided to procure and deploy a biometric staff management system to enhance staff compliance with time and attendance requirements.
According to University Secretary Yusuf Kiranda, this biometric system is intended to be linked to the Human Capital Management (HCM) attendance module and will be implemented as a physical clock-in system across the University, where each staff member would have to clock in at their respective duty stations.
In an October 12, 2023 letter, addressed to all Members of Staff and the University Council, Kiranda explained that the Government is implementing an integrated Human Capital Management System (HCM) to automate Human Resource Management functions in the Public Service. As a result, the University Council, during its special meeting on March 9, 2023, resolved to procure and deploy a biometric staff management system to improve staff adherence to time and attendance of duty. This biometric system is to be integrated with the HCM attendance module.
However, in an October 20th letter to the University Council Chairperson, signed by Dr. Robert Kakuru, the Muasa Chairperson and General Secretary, Christine Mpyangu Mbabazi, the Muasa members expressed their rejection of the implementation of the Biometric Attendance Management System. They firmly believe that there should be more competitive and consultative methods for monitoring academic staff performance and productivity.
The letter goes on to highlight that the introduction of the Biometric system lacked adequate consultation and stakeholder engagement. It is the opinion of the staff that this system will severely undermine their ability to deliver the mandate of the University. “Members further believe the Biometric system is unacademic and a non-starter. The substantial financial investment in this system should be reallocated to retool staff for executing their mandate,” reads part of the letter.
“The University’s programs and interventions are guided by well-thought policies adopted after extensive consultation with all stakeholders. Unfortunately, this Biometric system is being rushed into implementation without adequate consultations and without a clear University policy,” states another part of the letter.
Muasa argues that the forceful implementation of the Biometric system is viewed as regressive and could cause a brain drain, potentially leading to a significant number of staff resignations. They believe that the University should prioritize staff productivity based on outputs rather than physical presence.
Do you have a story in your community or an opinion to share with us: Email us at thestandard256@gmail.com
Or WhatsApp Us on +256750474440
